For an OEM integrator or printer manufacturer, the question is never just “what color do I need?”. It’s “will this ink run stable in my printhead, at my line speed, without clogging, for the full service life of the equipment?”. The answer depends on the ink being hardware-agnostic by design from the formulation stage \u2014 not adapted afterward.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A hardware-agnostic ink or masterbatch is designed to meet the standards of the leading OEM manufacturers, covering all three major printhead technology families:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is only possible if the pigment’s particle distribution is fine and narrow enough to not compromise on any of the three. It’s the same reason dispersion (d90 < 200 nm \u2014 see our pillar on UV\/LED masterbatches) is the technical starting point, not an afterthought.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Digiti Signum formulations are validated on the following OEM platforms:<\/p>\n\n\n\n Seven platforms, seven distinct printhead architectures \u2014 validation isn’t theoretical: each one goes through the same quality control cycle before being confirmed as compatible.<\/p>\n\n\n\n On a Xaar 1001 GS 6pl platform, with Phoseon FireJet curing, the DS 3970 UV LED masterbatch achieves perfect curing behavior in single-pass applications running at 24.7 m\/min and 6 kHz \u2014 with strict EuPIA compliance and total absence of Vinyl Caprolactam. That’s the level of detail behind every ink\u2013printhead\u2013curing combination we validate before recommending it to an integrator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The starting point is always the same, whether or not your printhead is on the list above: you tell us your printhead platform, your curing system and your real production conditions, and we validate \u2014 or develop \u2014 the specific formulation for that combination, with technical data sheet and batch traceability.<\/p>\n\n\n\n What if my printhead isn’t on the list of validated platforms?<\/strong> It doesn’t rule out compatibility \u2014 it means a specific validation is needed before giving the go-ahead. We evaluate it with a real test run on your equipment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Can you certify the ink for a specific machine in my line, not just the generic printhead?<\/strong> Yes. Final validation is always done on the real combination of printhead, curing system and substrate \u2014 not just on the printhead manufacturer’s generic data sheet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Does the same formulation work for binary, grayscale and multidrop technology?<\/strong> The dispersion base is agnostic, but fine-tuning of viscosity and curing is validated per technology. We don’t approve a combination without having tested it on that specific architecture.<\/p>\n\n\n\nManufacturer<\/th> Models<\/th><\/tr><\/thead> Xaar<\/td> 500, 126, 1001, 1002<\/td><\/tr> Ricoh<\/td> GEN5<\/td><\/tr> Kyocera<\/td> KJ4A<\/td><\/tr> Konica Minolta<\/td> 1024, 512<\/td><\/tr> Seiko<\/td> 508, 510, 1024<\/td><\/tr> Toshibatec<\/td> CF1L<\/td><\/tr> Epson<\/td> PrecisionCore<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\n What gets validated on each platform<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n
Validated performance: a real case<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
How we work with OEM integrators<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
Frequently asked questions<\/h2>\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n